The โ€œRed Waveโ€ Mass Hysteria Was A Sad Commentary On The Media-Polling Business Nexus

$upport via Cash App


The 2022 midterm election will not only go down in history as one which produced the most unlikely outcome for the party in power, but also, one where the pollsters got it totally wrong. As a matter of fact, the pollsters got it so wrong, that the public is convinced, they were deliberately misled with the โ€œred wave/tsunamiโ€ predictions. Itโ€™s therefore only fair that the mainstream media journalists who got sucked into the red wave mass hysteria be named and shamed, and their actions memorialized for future referenceโ€“sort of a handy list, if you will.

MSNBC did an interesting, and quite frankly, hilarious mashup of the โ€œred waveโ€ mass hysteria that appeared to suck up even some well respected journalists from reputable networks. This shows how these faulty/fake polls can affect mainstream media coverage of elections, which can then have negative consequences, up to and including depressing voter turnout. This is therefore an issue that needs to be addressed head on as we approach the 2024 general elections.

Politicians are known to exaggerate, so they are not the subject of this naming and shaming. Our interest here is only on journalists, who ought to know better.

Fox Newsโ€™ Steve Doocey(1:39): โ€œYou know, your predictions of a red wave are accurate.โ€

Unidentified Fox News Reporter(1:42):โ€โ€ฆa red wave is coming.โ€

Fox News star Anchor Laura Ingraham(1:44): โ€œRed Wave Rising.โ€ This is the title of a whole segment Ingraham dedicated on the โ€œred waveโ€ on 10/18/22. Not a good look, Laura, not a good look.

Unidentified Reporter on NewsMax(1:51): โ€œSleepy Joe just guaranteed a red wave in Pennsylvania.โ€

Fox Newsโ€™ Dana Perino(2:01): โ€œDemocrats are bracing for the worst case scenario, a red Tsunami.โ€

Fox Newsโ€™ Greg Gutfeld(2:04): โ€œWe are officially on a red Tsunami watch.โ€ He was apparently referring to an Axios piece by Josh Kraushaar titled โ€œRED TSUNAMI WATCH.โ€ Not a good look Josh, not a good look.

Fox Newsโ€™ Clay Travis(2:09): โ€œRed Tsunami growsโ€ฆthat means red Tsunami.โ€

Fox Newsโ€™ Stephen Miller(2:16): โ€œPoverty, joblessness, critical race theory, crazy gender ideology in our schools, we are going to see a red Tsunami.โ€

Unidentified host of Fox Newsโ€™ The Five show(2:34): โ€œUp next, Elon Musk ready to ride the big red wave.โ€

Fox Newsโ€™ Steve Doocey(2:37): โ€œElon Musk tweeted massive red wave.โ€ For the record, Musk did indeed tweet about a red wave. Other Fox News personalities who used this Elon Musk tweet to proclaim a โ€œred waveโ€ were Tucker Carlson(biggest star on Fox), Maria Bartiromo, among others. Not a good look, Elon, not a good look.

Daily Wireโ€™s Ben Shapiro(2:43): โ€œYouโ€™re about to see a red wave, that makes โ€˜Day After Tomorrowโ€™ [the popular movie] look like nothing.โ€

Leading Podcaster Joe Rogan(2:47): โ€œThatโ€™s going to be responsible for the red wave. I think the red wave thatโ€™s coming is going to be like the elevator doors opening up in โ€˜The Shining'[popular 80โ€™s movie]โ€

Daily Wireโ€™s Ben Shapiro(2:55): โ€œRogan said that the red wave is going to look like the elevator doors opening, and the blood pouring out of the elevator in โ€˜The Shiningโ€™, that is correct, except itโ€™s not going to be an elevator, itโ€™s going to look more like โ€˜Deep Impact โ€˜[popular movie], the tsunami at the end, but colored red.โ€ Good Lord have mercy!!

Fox News Contributor Dan Bongino(3:10): โ€œRemember that Teo Leone โ€˜Deep Impactโ€™ disaster movie? Thatโ€™s the red wave tsunami that will come ashore.โ€

Daily Wireโ€™s Ben Shapiro(3:17): โ€œItโ€™s going to be a brutal week for the Democrats beginning on Tuesday.โ€

Fox Newsโ€™ Clay Travis(3:21): โ€œFrankly, Iโ€™ve already DVR-ed CNN and MSNBC for election night, not because Iโ€™m going to watch, but just because I want to enjoy the tears post-red tsumami.โ€ Hope youโ€™re enjoying those DVRs, Clay.

Fox Newsโ€™ Jesse Watters(0:05): โ€œItโ€™s going to be a wave election, and you [Democrats] gonna lose the Senate, Iโ€™ll bet you $1,000 now.โ€

Fox Newsโ€™ Lisa Boothe(0:12): โ€œDemocrats are going to be crushed on November 8th because a red wave is coming.โ€

Fox Newsโ€™ Greg Gutfeld(0:16): โ€œBetting that Joy will learn two new words on Tuesday, red wave.โ€

Unidentified Fox Business host(0:21): โ€œHow big could that looming red wave get?โ€

Fox Businessโ€™ Maria Bartiromo(0:23): โ€œWe begin this Sunday morning with expectations of a red wave this Tuesday.โ€

Fox News Contributor Marc Thiessen(0:39): โ€œWeโ€™ve been hearing, โ€˜is it going to be a red wave?โ€™, โ€˜is it going to be a red tsunami?โ€™, I think itโ€™s going to be a red hurricane.โ€

Fox Newsโ€™ Pete Hegseth(0:43): โ€œWhen the red wave comes, and it is coming, Joe Bidenโ€™s political utility is over.โ€

Fox Newsโ€™ John Roberts(0:48): โ€œAre we in for a red wind here, or a red wave?โ€

Fox Newsโ€™ Martha MacCallum(0:51): โ€œRed wave or red tsunami, what are you feeling today?โ€

Fox Newsโ€™ Jesse Watters(0:54): โ€œAnd donโ€™t listen to the lies they are spewing, that this could take daysโ€ฆto know who won. This is total bs. A wave like this, we should know that night, basically, who won the Senate and the House, and even if it happens Wednesday into Thursday, itโ€™s gravy.โ€

Unidentified Fox News Reporter reporting on an actual tropical storm approaching Florida(1:09): โ€œRight out the back door, Iโ€™ve got a tropical storm brewing right now. I think theyโ€™re saying it could be a category one by the end of the day. However, let me tell you what is the storm, that red waveโ€ฆโ€  Oh boy!!

Thereโ€™s also this clip from MSNBCโ€™s The Beat with Ari Melber which shows even journalists from CNN sucked into the โ€œred waveโ€ mass hysteria. Not a good look, CNN, not a good look.

CNN & ABCโ€™s Alyssa Farah Griffin(7:28): โ€œA red wave is coming. Republicans are going to win the midtermsโ€ฆโ€

New York Postโ€™s Karol Markowicz(7:32): โ€œForget red wave, Iโ€™m rooting for a red tsunami. โ€œ

CNNโ€™s Jake Tapper(7:34): โ€œPoliticos with whom I spoke today all agree, as of now, a modest red wave at the very least, seems to be building.โ€

Fox Newsโ€™ Dana Perino(7:49): โ€œSigns of a red wave are kind of getting bigger than ever, but not everybody in the media wants to hear that.โ€ Dana is a former White House Press Secretary.

Fox Newsโ€™ Jesse Watters(7:55): โ€œIt wasnโ€™t looking like a red wave earlier in August, and now it looks like a tsunami.โ€

As MSNBC host Ari Melber aptly summarized it (8:00): โ€œThe point there is not that multiple news channels over there echo Fox and sound similar, as they make those predictions that have been proven falseโ€ฆItโ€™s bigger than the media or polls. This is a larger effort to hack your mind, and the discourse, and shape the ultimate turnout for the results in our democracy itselfโ€ฆIt is legal to be sure, but itโ€™s also misleading with real consequencesโ€ฆIf you really have a huge bankable lead, you donโ€™t need to hype it. You just turn your voters out and win, but so many Republican leaders know their slate of MAGA candidates lately, is very weakโ€ฆSo Republicans concluded they needed to inflate their perceived support in the hopes that that might then create more support than they have actually haveโ€ฆโ€

Bottom line folks, this stuff is serious. New York Governor Kathy Hochul also addressed this fake poll issue, which featured prominently in her race. What Gov Hochul said about this serious issue lines up with the assessment by MSNBCโ€™s Ari Melber. 

Voters have a right to know which polling firms are credible, and those with a history of manipulating polls to aid campaigns. This will prevent reputable news channels from getting sucked into theseย โ€œwaveโ€ย hoaxes, as they report on elections.

For the record, Yours Truly never fell for the โ€œred wave/tsunamiโ€ mass hysteria for one minute.

For those of you very happy with @Emolclauseโ€™s activism donโ€™t shy away from the โ€œtip jarโ€ below on your way out. You may also Cash App

Email author at admin@grassrootsdempolitics.com

Become an Octapharma Plasma donor. Make up to $200 in one week and help save lives too! Learn More

Bombshell Intercept Report Exposes DHSโ€™ Mission Creep From Fighting Terrorism To Disinfo

$upport via Cash App

A very interesting segment on Fox Newsโ€™ Tucker Carlson show(10/31/22) featured a bombshell Pulitzer-worthy report by The Interceptโ€™s Lee Fang, which revealed that the Department of Homeland Security(DHS), has for five years now, been collaborating with Twitter, Facebook, and other social media companies, in determining whose speech needs to be suppressed. This of course flies in the face of the โ€œprivate companyโ€ defense usually used to justify questionable speech infringement practices by the social media giants.

More importantly, Lee Fangโ€™s bombshell also touched on the apparent โ€œmission creepโ€(his words) of DHS, where over the last five years, the powerful agency had unilaterally(without congressional approval) shifted from its stated focus of combating terrorism and terrorist groups like Al-Qaida, to combating disinformation online.

Asked whether the Biden administration was working with tech companies to censor people, Lee Fang responded (1:10): โ€œYeah, thatโ€™s right Tucker. We looked at really hundreds of documents that paint a vivid picture of the FBI, the DHS, closely collaborating with top social media platforms, Twitter and Facebook, to censor various forms of content under the banner of fighting disinformation, and the story shows a couple of things, one, it shows what you just mentioned, a very cozy relationship between the government and these tech giants. Thereโ€™s those monthly meetings that you just mentioned, but also, just very cozy emails and texts, not a very adversarial relationship. We looked at one text where a Microsoft executive texts Jen Easterly, the top disinfo director at DHS, appointed by[President]Biden, basically saying that the private sector needs to get more comfortable with the government closely collaborating on reports, talking about the expanded role for DHS in censoring a really broad collection of topic areas of policy and political topics.โ€

Lee Fang then touched on what I believe is by far, the biggest bombshell from his piece, and that is, the โ€œmission creepโ€ aspect. Fang said(2:11): โ€œJust broadly speaking, the story also just looks at the mission creep of DHS. This is an agency that was founded in the aftermath of 9/11 to combat foreign terror threats of Al-Qaeda and the like, but over the last five years, itโ€™s kind of evolved in its mission, its move towards fighting disinfo, and their justification is disinfo radicalizes the homeland, it can lead to disruptions in public health, or political violenceโ€ฆโ€

Even given DHSโ€™ understandable explanation for going after online disinformation, no reasonable person can ever conclude that Congress would have approved the same powerful tools/tactics used to counter terrorist groups like Al-Qaeda, to be applied against U.S. residents for basically saying the โ€œwrong thingsโ€ on social media. Sadly however, this is exactly where we find ourselves today, with DHSโ€™ speech police designating people they deem โ€œmisinformersโ€ as terrorists, and then mercilessly destroying their lives and livelihoods using among other things, the military. This is shameful conduct which most Americans have always associated with third world dictatorships.

It is because of DHSโ€™ mission creep, that Yours Truly believes Lee Fangโ€™s bombshell piece deserves a Pulitzer. Simply put, DHSโ€™ mission creep, which at the very least should have been run through Congress for approval prior to enforcement, has not only seriously impacted the lives and livelihoods of many U.S. residents who have nothing to do with terrorism, but has also robbed them of their rights under the first amendment.

Congress needs to immediately step in to not only address DHSโ€™ mission creep, but also to hold the officials involved accountable, preferably, via referral for criminal prosecution given the way their unconstitutional actions upend innocent peopleโ€™s lives

Itโ€™s also important to point out here what history has taught us, and that is, not everything the government labels โ€œmisinformationโ€ is necessarily so. Often times, there are topics the government simply doesnโ€™t want out there, being discussed in public. One recent classic example is directed energy weapons. For decades, government agents, and their surrogates in the mainstream media, went out of their way to label people who expressed concerns about these weapons as delusional conspiracy theorists. In 2022 however, we not only have the same directed energy weapons being openly discussed by the same mainstream media channels who denied their existence, but also, the government considers the threat so serious, that Congress swiftly enacted a handsome compensation scheme for victims of such attacks.

Bottom line folks, as host Tucker Carlson correctly stated, this bombshell piece by The Intercept is not only a great story, itโ€™s also a huge public service for which Lee Fang deserves a lot of praise and reward. The only question now is whether Congress will do its job, and rein in Mission Creep DHS, and its unconstitutional speech police.

For those of you very happy with @Emolclauseโ€™s activism donโ€™t shy away from the โ€œtip jarโ€ below on your way out. You may also Cash App

Email author at admin@grassrootsdempolitics.com

Become an Octapharma Plasma donor. Make up to $200 in one week and help save lives too!ย Learn More