Major Milestone in the Havana Syndrome Debate

The mysterious illness known as Havana Syndrome has returned to the national spotlight following a bombshell investigation by 60 Minutes. The report revealed that U.S. authorities obtained and studied a suspected microwave weapon believed by some investigators to be capable of producing symptoms consistent with those reported by victims of the syndrome. According to sources cited in the broadcast, undercover agents working with the U.S. government acquired the device from a Russian criminal network in a covert operation reportedly funded by the Pentagon. The deviceโ€”described as portable and concealable, potentially small enough to fit inside a backpackโ€”emits pulsed electromagnetic or microwave energy that can penetrate walls and windows and may affect brain tissue. 

The existence of such a compact device is particularly striking because many experts had long dismissed what critics called the โ€œray gunโ€ theory. For years, skeptics argued that if a microwave or directed-energy weapon were responsible for the neurological symptoms reported by diplomats and intelligence personnel, the equipment would likely be large and power-hungryโ€”far too bulky to be carried discreetly. Yet the reporting suggests investigators have examined a device designed to operate silently and at relatively low power while still producing pulsed electromagnetic emissions. That does not prove the device was responsible for the incidents, but it demonstrates that technology capable of delivering directed microwave energy in a portable form may indeed exist. 

The suspected weapon was reportedly acquired in an undercover operation that cost roughly $15 million, after investigators learned that a Russian criminal network was trafficking the device on the black market. Once obtained, the system was allegedly tested at U.S. military facilities to determine whether its emissions could replicate symptoms similar to those experienced by affected personnel, including dizziness, migraines, hearing disturbances, and cognitive impairment. Since the first cluster of cases emerged among U.S. diplomats in Cuba in 2016, hundreds of government personnel stationed overseasโ€”and in some cases within the United Statesโ€”have reported sudden neurological symptoms that remain difficult to explain. 

The new reporting has also revived debate over who might be responsible for the incidents. Some investigators and former officials have pointed to Russia or Russian-linked actors as possible culprits, citing decades of research in microwave and radio-frequency weapons conducted during the Cold War and afterward. At the same time, the intelligence communityโ€™s most recent official assessment in 2023 concluded that it was โ€œvery unlikelyโ€ that a foreign adversary was behind the majority of reported cases, illustrating how divided the government itself remains over the underlying cause. 

Another dimension of the discussion involves the long history of directed-energy research conducted by multiple countries, including the United States. Declassified documents show that the U.S. military explored technologies capable of using microwave energy to influence or disrupt human physiology. One of the better-known projects was the MEDUSA program in the early 2000s, which investigated the so-called microwave auditory effectโ€”an interaction between microwave radiation and the human nervous system. The existence of such research does not prove that similar systems have been weaponized or deployed operationally, but it underscores that the underlying science has been studied for decades by multiple governments.

The debate has also been shaped by the question of who is affected. Public discussion has largely focused on diplomats, intelligence officers, and military personnel who reported sudden neurological symptoms while stationed abroad. However, some civilians have claimed for years that similar technologies have been used against them, allegations that government officials and many scientists have historically dismissed as unsupported. The renewed attention sparked by the latest reporting has led some observers to argue that the conversation should broaden to include all claims and evidence, rather than focusing exclusively on incidents involving government personnel.

Whether the latest revelations ultimately confirm the directed-energy hypothesis or simply add another layer to a still-unresolved mystery remains to be seen. What is clear is that the investigation into Havana Syndrome is far from over. As more information emerges about the device reportedly obtained by U.S. authorities, pressure is likely to grow on policymakers to examine the issue more closely. That could include renewed scrutiny by United States Congress, which has already held hearings on the health impacts suffered by affected government employees. If those inquiries expand, lawmakers may be forced to confront not only the question of what caused these incidents, but also whether the phenomenon extends beyond the cases that first brought Havana Syndrome into public view.

Rep AOC Calls For Senate Probe Into Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito

$upport viaย Cash App๐Ÿ‘‡

Rep Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) appeared on the 05/22/24 edition of MSNBC’s All In w/Chris Hayes show, where she dropped a bombshell by calling for a U.S. Senate probe into the affairs of Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito. Rep AOC’s call for an investigation is of course related to recent news reports that say a flag known to be sympathetic to the January 6th insurrection, was spotted flying at Justice Alito’s residence.

Asked by host Chris Hayes what she thought about the Alito news reports, Rep AOC replied(2:22): “I don’t even think that we have to wait until we have a Democratic House majority, because we have a Democratic Senate majority. This is an alarm that I have been sounding for quite some time now. I think that what we’re seeing here, is an extraordinary breach of not just the trust and the stature of the Supreme Court, but we’re seeing a fundamental challenge to our democracy. [Justice] Samuel Alito has identified himself with the same people who raided the Capitol on January 6th, and is now going to be presiding over court cases that have deep implications over the participants of that rally.”

Rep AOC went on to add that Democrats cannot just keep on sitting on power after getting elected. They actually have to use the power that voters bestow upon them, to start addressing this runaway Supreme Court, and other burning voter concerns.

Rep AOC specifically told host Chris Hayes(3:13): “Democrats have a responsibility for defending our democracy, and in the Senate, we have gavels. There should be subpoenas going out, there should be active investigations that are happening, and I believe that when House Democrats take the majority, we are preparing and ensuring to support the broader effort to stand up our democracy…When Democrats have power, we have to use it. We cannot be in perpetual campaign mode. We need to be in governance mode, we need to be in accountability mode, with every lever that we have…”

As you know, Yours Truly has for a long time lamented weakness by congressional Dems. It was therefore quite refreshing to see Rep AOC calling it out too.

https://twitter.com/Emolclause/status/1648761419251302401?t=IYMJDz7UPSwfOtKhLULw9w&s=19

For those of you very happy withย @Emolclauseโ€™s activism donโ€™t shy away from the CashApp โ€œtip jarโ€๐Ÿ‘‡ below on your way out.

Email author at admin@grassrootsdempolitics.com

Rep Jim Jordanโ€™s Shifty Answers About His Convos With Trump On January 6th

$upport via Cash App

CNNโ€™s Brianna Keilar did an interesting segment on her New Day show (10/21/2021), where she explored Rep Jim Jordanโ€™s very shifty answers to questions about his conversations with then President Trump on January 6th 2021. It appears Rep Jim Jordanโ€™s accounts of his conversations with Trump on that fateful day appear to be changing with every subsequent interview, meaning he may be hiding, or attempting to hide some details about his interactions with Trump on that day.

After stating categorically in previous interviews that he spoke to Trump on January 6th, but only after the insurrection, the Ohio Congressman appears to be changing his tune lately, suggesting that he spoke to Trump on January 6th, but he doesnโ€™t know โ€œwhen those conversations happened.โ€ Basically, he now doesnโ€™t remember whether he spoke to Trump before or after the insurrection.

Any reasonable person presented with Rep Jim Jordanโ€™s conflicting statements as to whether he spoke to Trump before or after the January 6th insurrection will arrive at the same conclusion, and that is, Rep Jim Jordan is attempting to hide details of his January 6th conversations with Trump from the public. Rep Jordanโ€™s phone records on January 6th can solve this mystery instantly.

Bottom line folks, one doesnโ€™t have to be an experienced investigator to deduce from the CNN segment that Rep Jordan should be a person of interest for the January 6th Commission. Maybe, just maybe, heโ€™ll remember the exact time he spoke to Trump on January 6th, if he is forced to testify under oath.

For those of you very happy with @Emolclauseโ€™s activism donโ€™t shy away from the โ€œtip jarโ€ below on your way out. You may also Cash App

Email author at admin@grassrootsdempolitics.com

Become an Octapharma Plasma donor. Make up to $200 in one week and help save lives too!ย Learn More

NYTโ€™s Maggie Haberman Ensnared In Feud Over Trump Inaugural Funds

$upport via Cash App

Melania Trump with Stephanie Winston Wolkoff

In case you missed it, the Trump inaugural saga has taken a new, and very interesting twist lately, with now Twitter-active Stephanie Winston Wolkoff taking a direct shot at Maggie Haberman and Ken Vogel of the New York Times(NYT), as being part of the plot to throw her under the bus.

Youโ€™ll remember that after the bombshell revelation that a staggering $40 million of Trumpโ€™s inaugural funds had mysteriously disappeared, there was an effort by Trumpโ€™s allies to pin the blame on then First Lady Melania Trumpโ€™s Senior Advisor Stephanie Winston Wolkoff. Stephanie Wolkoff talked about this effort to throw her under the bus at an appearance on MSNBCโ€™s Rachel Maddow show on September 1, 2020.

In the interview, a visibly upset Stephanie Wolkoff told host Maddow, that then First Lady Melania Trump basically told her she had to be the fall person for the Trump inaugural scandal. Wolkoff specifically said, โ€œMelania and the [Trump]White House had accused me of criminal activity, then publicly shamed and fired me, and made me their scapegoat. At that moment in time, thatโ€™s when I pressed record. She was no longer my friend, and she was willing to let them take me down, and she told me herself, that this is the way it has to be. She was advised by the attorneys at the White House that there was no other choice because there was a possible investigation into the presidential inauguration committeeโ€ฆ.At first I really did think maybe she would come to my aid? Maybe she would tell the truth? She turned her back, she did. She folded like a deck of cards., and Iโ€™m shocked she did it.โ€

This 05/23/2021 tweet however, shows that Stephanie Wolkoff is not only going after Trump and his allies in her effort to set the record straight regarding Trumpโ€™s inaugural, sheโ€™s also calling out NYTโ€™s Maggie Haberman and Ken Vogel, as being part of the plot to destroy her. This, if proven, could turn out to be a huge scandal unto itself, given the fact that many liberals still blame the New York Times for Trumpโ€™s ascension to the White House. Specifically, many liberals believe NYTโ€™s excessive coverage of the โ€œemail scandalโ€, weakened Hillary Clintonโ€™s campaign during the final stretch of the 2016 campaign.

Thereโ€™s no other way any reasonable person can interpret Stephanie Wolkoffโ€™s tweet other than NYTโ€™s Haberman and Vogel were doing Trumpโ€™s bidding when they wrote the referenced piece. This is especially so considering Wolkoffโ€™s invocation of โ€œSETUP. COVERUP. TAKEDOWNโ€ in her tweet. For the record, accusations of โ€œaccess journalismโ€ against then White House reporter for the New York Times, Maggie Haberman, persisted throughout Trumpโ€™s presidency. Stephanie Wolkoff is not the first person drawing that inference.

Bottom line folks, Yours Truly is not accusing Maggie Haberman or Ken Vogel of any wrongdoing. By all accounts, these are serious journalists, who exhibit a high level of professionalism(my personal opinion). What Yours Truly is simply pointing out, is what any reasonable person presented with Stephanie Wolkoffโ€™s recent tweet would conclude, and that is, Haberman and Vogel were in on the plot by Trumpโ€™s allies to throw her under the bus. It would be in everybodyโ€™s interest, especially Wolkoff who suffered greatly as a result of the Trump inaugural saga, if Haberman, Vogel or even the New York Times management, addressed this issue.

For those of you very happy with @Emolclauseโ€™s activism donโ€™t shy away from the โ€œtip jarโ€ below on your way out. You may also Cash App

Email author at admin@grassrootsdempolitics.com

Become an Octapharma Plasma donor. Make up to $200 in one week and help save lives too! Learn More