Major Milestone in the Havana Syndrome Debate

The mysterious illness known as Havana Syndrome has returned to the national spotlight following a bombshell investigation by 60 Minutes. The report revealed that U.S. authorities obtained and studied a suspected microwave weapon believed by some investigators to be capable of producing symptoms consistent with those reported by victims of the syndrome. According to sources cited in the broadcast, undercover agents working with the U.S. government acquired the device from a Russian criminal network in a covert operation reportedly funded by the Pentagon. The deviceโ€”described as portable and concealable, potentially small enough to fit inside a backpackโ€”emits pulsed electromagnetic or microwave energy that can penetrate walls and windows and may affect brain tissue. 

The existence of such a compact device is particularly striking because many experts had long dismissed what critics called the โ€œray gunโ€ theory. For years, skeptics argued that if a microwave or directed-energy weapon were responsible for the neurological symptoms reported by diplomats and intelligence personnel, the equipment would likely be large and power-hungryโ€”far too bulky to be carried discreetly. Yet the reporting suggests investigators have examined a device designed to operate silently and at relatively low power while still producing pulsed electromagnetic emissions. That does not prove the device was responsible for the incidents, but it demonstrates that technology capable of delivering directed microwave energy in a portable form may indeed exist. 

The suspected weapon was reportedly acquired in an undercover operation that cost roughly $15 million, after investigators learned that a Russian criminal network was trafficking the device on the black market. Once obtained, the system was allegedly tested at U.S. military facilities to determine whether its emissions could replicate symptoms similar to those experienced by affected personnel, including dizziness, migraines, hearing disturbances, and cognitive impairment. Since the first cluster of cases emerged among U.S. diplomats in Cuba in 2016, hundreds of government personnel stationed overseasโ€”and in some cases within the United Statesโ€”have reported sudden neurological symptoms that remain difficult to explain. 

The new reporting has also revived debate over who might be responsible for the incidents. Some investigators and former officials have pointed to Russia or Russian-linked actors as possible culprits, citing decades of research in microwave and radio-frequency weapons conducted during the Cold War and afterward. At the same time, the intelligence communityโ€™s most recent official assessment in 2023 concluded that it was โ€œvery unlikelyโ€ that a foreign adversary was behind the majority of reported cases, illustrating how divided the government itself remains over the underlying cause. 

Another dimension of the discussion involves the long history of directed-energy research conducted by multiple countries, including the United States. Declassified documents show that the U.S. military explored technologies capable of using microwave energy to influence or disrupt human physiology. One of the better-known projects was the MEDUSA program in the early 2000s, which investigated the so-called microwave auditory effectโ€”an interaction between microwave radiation and the human nervous system. The existence of such research does not prove that similar systems have been weaponized or deployed operationally, but it underscores that the underlying science has been studied for decades by multiple governments.

The debate has also been shaped by the question of who is affected. Public discussion has largely focused on diplomats, intelligence officers, and military personnel who reported sudden neurological symptoms while stationed abroad. However, some civilians have claimed for years that similar technologies have been used against them, allegations that government officials and many scientists have historically dismissed as unsupported. The renewed attention sparked by the latest reporting has led some observers to argue that the conversation should broaden to include all claims and evidence, rather than focusing exclusively on incidents involving government personnel.

Whether the latest revelations ultimately confirm the directed-energy hypothesis or simply add another layer to a still-unresolved mystery remains to be seen. What is clear is that the investigation into Havana Syndrome is far from over. As more information emerges about the device reportedly obtained by U.S. authorities, pressure is likely to grow on policymakers to examine the issue more closely. That could include renewed scrutiny by United States Congress, which has already held hearings on the health impacts suffered by affected government employees. If those inquiries expand, lawmakers may be forced to confront not only the question of what caused these incidents, but also whether the phenomenon extends beyond the cases that first brought Havana Syndrome into public view.

A Strong Case For Trumpโ€™s Military Intervention In Venezuela

Please consider $upporting GDPolitics by scanning the QR code below or clicking on this link

An interesting segment on MSNOW featured Hagar Chemali, who made one of the most coherent and intellectually serious cases yet for President Trumpโ€™s military posture toward Venezuela. Going into the segment, the prevailing narrative across television news was nearly unanimous: Trumpโ€™s actions were framed as a reckless violation of international law, untethered from any legitimate U.S. national security interest. What Chemali didโ€”methodically and without theatricsโ€”was complicate that narrative in a way most pundits either cannot or will not.

Chemali did not dispute that Trumpโ€™s actions strain, and may even violate, existing international legal frameworks. Instead, she argued that focusing exclusively on legality misses the more consequential question of national security. According to Chemali, the postโ€“World War II international systemโ€”particularly institutions like the United Nationsโ€”has become largely incapable of enforcing the very rules it was designed to uphold. That vacuum, she contends, has been aggressively exploited by rogue states and non-state actors who operate with near impunity, often embedding themselves in fragile or hostile regimes much closer to U.S. shores than many Americans appreciate.

What gives Chemaliโ€™s argument particular weight is her background. She is not a partisan talking head or an armchair strategist. Chemali served in senior roles at the U.S. Department of the Treasury, including in the Office of Terrorist Financing and Financial Crimes, where she worked directly on counterterrorism, sanctions policy, and efforts to disrupt the financial networks of hostile states and extremist groups. She also held positions during the Obama administration and has worked closely with interagency national security teams, giving her firsthand exposure to how threats are assessed when cameras are not rolling. In other words, she understands how national security doctrine is applied in practice, not just debated on cable news panels.

From that vantage point, Chemali argues that Venezuela cannot be viewed in isolation. It is not merely a failing state or a humanitarian crisis; it has become a strategic foothold for U.S. adversaries seeking influence in the Western Hemisphere. In that context, she suggests, the United States asserting a policing role in the Americas is less about imperial ambition and more about responding to a security architecture that no longer functions. When international bodies fail to actโ€”or selectively enforce rulesโ€”power vacuums do not remain empty for long.

Chemaliโ€™s analysis effectively provides the Trump administration with a serious national security rationale that goes beyond bluster or appeals to raw power. It offers a framework for countering the charge that the administration is acting lawlessly by arguing that the law itself has become disconnected from enforcement realities. Whether one agrees with that conclusion or not, it is a far more substantive defense than the caricature of Trump acting on impulse or ego.

Trump has occasionally gestured toward the Monroe Doctrine when addressing Venezuela, at times referring to his own version as the โ€œDonroe Doctrine,โ€ but he has rarely articulated the argument with the clarity or discipline Chemali brings to it. Her explanation distills what the administration seems to believe but has struggled to communicate: that American restraint, in a world where enforcement mechanisms are broken, can itself become a liability. Whether Trump adopts this rationale more explicitly going forward remains to be seen, but Chemaliโ€™s intervention may well give the administration an opening to reframe the debate on terms that are strategic rather than merely legalistic.

Maddow Fact Checks Trumpโ€™s SOTU Address

Support via Cash app๐Ÿ‘‡

On 03/04/25, President Donald Trump delivered the customary State of The Union address before a joint session of Congress. Per MSNBCโ€™s Rachel Maddow, this was the longest State of The Union speech ever delivered by a U.S. president.

Moments after President Trumpโ€™s address, Maddow delivered a blistering fact check to Trumpโ€™s address

Among the issues that Maddow fact checked President Trump on, was his assertion that he had spoken with the heads of U.S. auto manufacturers, and that they were happy with his proposed tariffs on the auto industry.

Maddow specifically said, “For the record, U.S. auto company CEOs are NOT psyched, and delighted, and sooo excited about Trump’s economic policies, including his tariffs.”

Less than 24 hours after Maddowโ€™s fact check, news broke that the Trump administration was pausing itโ€™s proposed tariffs on automakersโ€”a tacit admission that the said CEOs had never expressed optimism about the proposed auto tariffs, as the president had indicated on his State of The Union address.

For those of you very happy with @Emolclauseโ€™s activism donโ€™t shy away from the CashApp โ€œtip jarโ€ below on your way out.

Email author at admin@grassrootsdempolitics.com

Maddow Draws Striking Parallel Between Hitler & Putin Assaults And The U.S. Reaction To Them

Support via CashApp

In the 03/03/25 edition of MSNBC’ s Rachel Maddow Show, host Maddow pointed out the striking resemblance between how the U.S. dealt with Hitler’s assault on Europe, and the way the Trump administration is dealing with Putin’s current assault on Ukraine in particular, and Europe generally.

Maddow pointed out that by July 1940, Great Britain was the only European country left standing after Hitler’s forces had practically run over every other European country.

Then U.S. President Roosevelt was doing everything in his power to assist the Brits against Hitler’s forces. But interestingly, there was no consensus in the U.S. that the we should be assisting the Brits, which is quite similar to what we hear today from some leading Republican voices re Ukraine.

One of the leading Republican voices against Roosevelt assisting the Brits, was a U.S. Senator from Minnesota, one Ernest Lundeen.

Senator Lundeen apparently argued that Britain did not deserve America’s aid because it was not “grateful enough” for America’s past assistance(World War I, etc). He also argued, much like Republicans are arguing today, that Britain and other European allies needed to dig into their own mineral resources and pay America for its assistance–again, the same argument we are hearing today from leading Republicans.

It later came out, however, that during the entire time Senator Lundeen had been making these otherwise reasonable arguments against aid to Britain (on fiscal grounds), he was actually being paid by Hitler’s Germany to make their case from his lofty perch as a U.S. Senator.

The $1 million question now is, who is Putin paying to make his case in the U.S. Congress or even from a loftier perch, which I’ll leave to your imagination? Only time will tell.

For those of you very happy with @Emolclauseโ€™s activism donโ€™t shy away from the CashApp โ€œtip jarโ€ below on your way out.

Email author at admin@grassrootsdempolitics.com

Dem Sen Murphy Accuses Trump-Vance Of Steering America Towards Kleptocracy

Support via Cash app๐Ÿ‘‡

U.S. Senator Chris Murphy (D-CT) appeared on CNNSOTU (022825) where he dropped a bombshell, telling host Dana Bash that the shouting match we recently witnessed at the White House between President Trump, his VP Vance, and the President of Ukraine, was not an anomaly, but rather, a conscious effort by Trump-Vance to steer America towards kleptocracy.

The characterization by the mainstream media thus far, has been that the confrontation at the White House was just an unfortunate case of a good meeting gone badโ€”something that happened out of happenstance.

What Sen Murphy is saying however, is markedly different, and that is, this was a pre-meditated, conscious effort by Trump-Vance to humiliate the President of Ukraine for the benefit of Vladimir Putin. Furthermore, Sen Murphy adds that this is part of their larger effort to align America with dictators around the world, so as to make it easier for them to transform America into a kleptocratic oligarchy like Russia.

For those of you very happy with @Emolclauseโ€™s activism donโ€™t shy away from the CashApp โ€œtip jarโ€ below ๐Ÿ‘‡

Email author at admin@grassrootsdempolitics.com

CIA Accused Of Coverup In Havana Syndrome Probe

$upport via Cash App

Bombshell testimony at a House Homeland Security Committee hearing (05/08/24) regarding Havana Syndrome, opened up new leads for investigators to follow up on. The unmistakable message from all the three witnesses however, all of whom have deep experience/ties to the U.S. intel community, was that U.S. intel agencies, and the CIA in particular, were not leveling with the American public as to the cause of these ailments. More importantly, that the continued coverup threatens our national security because it provides an incentive for Russia and our other adversaries to ramp up the attacks.

The expert witnesses at the 05/08/24 hearing were Retired Army Lt. Colonel Gregory Edgreen (led DIA’s probe into havana syndrome), leading National Security Attorney Mark Zaid and award-winning journalist currently working for The Insider, Christo Grozev

We are not going to focus here on the technical/scientific issues surrounding havana syndrome but rather, the bombshell coverup allegations made by all the three expert witnesses. Reasonable people will agree that this by itself–a national security compromising coverup–should be sufficient cause for President Biden to do some “housecleaning” at the top echelons of our intel agencies.

Lt. Col Edgreen began by putting out some important context, and that is, the U.S. government has a long history of slowly responding to emergent national security threats, adding that the lax havana syndrome response “is nothing new”.

Edgreen(10:16): “As a country, we have been here before. Most people think this all started in Havana in 2016, the wildly reported Havana Syndrome…but before Havana Syndrome, there was the Moscow Syndrome. Soviet intelligence bathed the U.S. Embassy in Moscow with microwave transmissions. The health effects were similar to what we see today. There are many examples of syndromes and ailments from Americans injured in the line of duty, that the government did not recognize for many years, which were eventually proven. Agent Orange used in Vietnam, the Gulf War Syndrome, Burn Pits during the forever wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. In all of these examples, America took too long to acknowledge these injuries, and our service members languished without care. Havana Syndrome is no different. The gaslighting of AHI survivors continues to this day, as history repeats itself.”

Regarding documented reports of CIA officers being harassed overseas. Lt. Col Edgreen said(13:26): “There were reports of CIA incidents which included harassment, room intrusions, houses being defiled, tossed, pets poisoned, assaults on our personnel, and diplomats being drugged, doxxing, families harassed and attacked via directed energy, a red line to many because of the debilitating nature of these weapons…” Notice that these are the exact same complaints raised by targeted individuals in the United States, only to be summarily dismissed by the mainstream media as some form of “mass paranoia”.

Regarding the coverup, Lt Col Edgreen said(15:50): “I think the bar for AHI attribution was set so high because we do not, as a country and a government, want to face some very hard truths: Can we secure America? Are these massive counterintelligence failures? Can we protect our people on American soil? Is this an act of war?” Edgreen added, “It’s time to take action. This is a nonpartisan issue which has spanned several administrations. Let’s start to get this right with executive and legislative action…most importantly, pressure the government to fight back.”

Award-winning Journalist Christo Grozev testified that he had initially relied on information from U.S. government officials in his Havana Syndrome reporting, but was approached by an intel official in Europe, and advised to seek independent sources–Exhibit A as to a coverup, and a sad state of affairs indeed.

Attorney Mark Zaid testified(27:00): “A recent investigation by 60 Minutes, Der Spiegel and The Insider identified potential credible links between AHIs and alleged Russian operatives for military unit 29155. This included activities within the United States. What was the government’s response? CIA doubled down that there’s nothing to see, and that it knew of, and had already ruled out the same evidence. That is blatant falsehood that has infuriated many serving members of the intelligence community because so much of the evidence, to the contrary, is available to them in reports, briefings and cable traffic. Of course, this evidence is classified.”

Zaid added that regular law enforcement officials should be allowed to pursue investigations into Havana Syndrome rather than maintaining the status quo, where the CIA hogs such probes.

During the question and answer session, Christo Grozev said(29:59): “One of the most disturbing denials that I’ve seen in some of the publications leading up to our findings being published, was an attempt to create the impression that no technology would allow this impact on the human brain. That is provably untrue…There is sufficient evidence that it’s possible.” Grozev added that a Russian intelligence official told him that the Russians were doing this because America has been doing it to their intel officials as far back as the 80s. So this idea that AHIs are some mysterious occurrences requiring “new research” is highly questionable.

The biggest bombshell during the question and answer session came from Attorney Mark Zaid, when he was asked whether he believed the government was blocking some information. Zaid responded(37:44): “Information is absolutely being blocked from one agency to the other, particularly at the CIA. I mean, that’s who we’re going to point to the most, of information that the CIA has, that its sister intelligence agencies it hasn’t been shared with, and I can identify a number of specific classified documents in a proper setting.”

Bottom line folks, there’s no way to sugar coat this. Three esteemed expert witnesses testified in Congress on 05/08/24 that our intel agencies, and the CIA in particular, are not only engaged in a coverup when it comes to Havana Syndrome, but that the coverup threatens our national security because it provides an incentive for further such attacks. Heads must roll!!

For those of you very happy with @Emolclauseโ€™s activism donโ€™t shy away from the โ€œtip jarโ€ below on your way out. You may also Cash App

Email author at admin@grassrootsdempolitics.com

Become an Octapharma Plasma donor. Make up to $200 in one week and help save lives too! Learn More

Russia Behind GOP’s Opposition To Ukraine Funding

$upport viaย Cash App

Rep Marjorie Taylor-Greene(R-GA), the loudest opponent to Ukraine funding

A bombshell segment on Alex Wagner Tonight show (04/17/24), citing a Washington Post piece, confirmed what we’ve suspected all along, and that is, Putin’s Russia is behind the Republican Party’s opposition to efforts by Congress to provide funding for Ukraine, as it defends itself against a Russian invasion. The bombshell report essentially says that Rep Marjorie Taylor-Greene(R-GA), aptly nicknamed “Moscow Marge”, and other congressional Republicans currently opposed to Ukraine funding, are either willing or unwilling participants in Vladimir Putins propaganda campaign–a sad state of affairs indeed.

Host Alex Wagner(5:43): “…Ukraine and the vote for Ukraine funding has become a leverage point for Russia. The Washington Post has some explosive reporting…on newly revealed documents from inside Vladimir Putin’s government, documents which show how Russia is seeking to subvert western support for Ukraine and disrupt the domestic politics of the United States and European countries through propaganda campaigns and supporting isolationist and extremist policies. Russia is formenting division over Ukraine because it wants to weaken America’s role in the world. In particular, one Russian policy expert cited in one of these documents, specifically calls on Russia to continue to facilitate the coming to power of isolationist right-wing forces in America.”

Host Wagner then got very specific, adding, “Russia very much wants the Marjorie Taylor Greene’s to continue doing exactly what they are doing, because it serves Russia’s interests.”

Bottom line folks, host Alex Wagner and the Washington Post are absolutely correct. Trump GOP’s opposition to Ukraine funding is not rooted in some legitimate conservative ideology as they would like the public to believe. Instead, it is a shameless assist to Russia’s strongman Vladimir Putin, who they are banking on to help them win Congress and possibly the White House in 2024. You read that right, a win for Trump in 2024 is a win for Vladimir Putin.

For those of you very happy withย @Emolclauseโ€™s activism donโ€™t shy away from the โ€œtip jarโ€ below on your way out. You may also Cash App

Email author at admin@grassrootsdempolitics.com

Become an Octapharma Plasma donor. Make up to $200 in one week and help save lives too!ย Learn More

Green Party Presidential Candidate Cornel West Addresses “Spoiler” Charge

$upport via Cash App

U.S. presidential candidate Cornel West (Green Party) appeared on CNN’s The Source show (07/13/23) where he among other things, addressed the charge that he’s playing the role of “spoiler” for incumbent President Joe Biden in the upcoming 2024 election. You’ll remember back in 2016, Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein was blamed for helping Republican Donald Trump eke out wins in the key battleground states of Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania, thus securing enough electoral votes to win the presidency. Coincidentally, the same Jill Stein is now Cornel West’s campaign manager, as former President Trump appears poised to be Biden’s Republican challenger in 2024.

Asked by host Kaitlan Collins about the spoiler charge, and the fact that Jill Stein, who many blame for sinking Hillary in 2024 is his campaign manager, West dismissed the charge, adding(2:50): “The Democratic Party is so unsocratic, as well as undemocratic…Examine yourself. Examine why it is, you did not speak to the issues of poor and working people, and therefore you lost. If you’d rather lose than change and examine yourself, then you’re going to have third parties popping out all over the place because people are suffering out here.”

Asked whether he plans to endorse President Biden if the presidential race gets too tight, Cornel West gave quite an interesting response–the kind you’d expect from a seasoned intellectual like him. He said both Trump and Biden are bad choices for the presidency because Trump is leading us towards a second civil war, and Biden is leading us towards a third world war (an obvious reference to Biden’s pro-Ukraine stance).

It remains to be seen what effect Cornel West’s presidential run will have on President Biden’s reelection prospects. Will West cost Biden the White House in 2024 like Jill Stein cost Hillary Clinton in 2016? Only time will tell. What’s impossible to ignore however is the Trump-Jill Stein nexus when it comes to U.S. presidential elections, especially given the fact that they are both very friendly with Russia’s dictator Vladimir Putin, an avowed U.S. foe. This image of Jill Stein dining with Putin and other Kremlin officials, formed the basis of the allegations that she was a spoiler candidate in 2016.

For those of you very happy with @Emolclauseโ€™s activism donโ€™t shy away from the โ€œtip jarโ€ below on your way out. You may also Cash App

Email author at admin@grassrootsdempolitics.com

Become an Octapharma Plasma donor. Make up to $200 in one week and help save lives too! Learn More

Excellent UTSW Webinar On Havana Syndrome

$upport via Cash App

On 02/10/2022 the Department of Psychiatry and the Peter Oโ€™Donnell Jr. Brain Institute at the University of Texas Southwestern (UTSW-Dallas), hosted an excellent webinar on Havana Syndrome featuring some of the leading minds in Neurology and importantly, offering suggestions on the path forward for both government investigators, and affected families (victims).

The webinar titled โ€œHavana Syndrome: Medical, Scientific, and Policy Perspectivesโ€, featured this esteemed panel of subject matter experts.

Among the visiting speakers(not from UTSW) were Cipher CEO Suzanne Kelly, Fox News National Security Analyst Daniel Hoffman, Former CIA Officer and Havana Syndrome victim Marc Polymeropoulos, NPR National Security Correspondent Greg Myre, and of course, the star of the show, the undisputed MVP, Dr. James Giordano(Georgetown), who they saved for last. Dr. Giordanoโ€™s entire presentation is below.

The key takeaway from Dr Giordanoโ€™s presentation was this(video at 17:00): โ€œWhat this thing allowed us to do is to examine in greater detail, the technological readiness level(TRL),of forms of energy that could be directed in ways that would be scalable, fieldable, and therefore operationalizable. Now again, please understand that there is information that simply cannot be discussed in an open forum such as this, some of it exists as confidential and classifiedโ€ฆbut suffice it to say that information both at the time(2016, 2017, and part of 2018), and subsequently 2018 and 2019โ€ฆreveal that there are two primary domains of directable energy that represented not only state of the science and technology, but were at a point of technological readiness that would allow or enable possible deployability and operational use. The idea of utilizing accoustic rangeable devices in the high sonic and/or ultrasonic range, very possible, very probable. The possibility of also utilizing some form of microwave energy particularly low to moderate gigawatt microwave energy that could be generated using very very rapid pulsing, perhaps utilizing a light source or laser source to be able to develop nanosecond or perhaps even quicker pulsing, would allow the scalability, the fieldability, and the containability of microwaves, and also get by some of the power source requirements that might be necessary. Why would such devices be in operation?โ€ฆThese types of devices can be used for surveillance, and/or they can be used either kinetically or non-kinetically, for disruptive effects. What do we mean by that[disruptive effects]? What we mean, is that there are a number of nations worldwide that have dedicated effort to employing these devices for testing organic and inorganic substances primarily in the occupational and commercial rangeโ€ฆThey[nations]include United States and many of its allies, China, Russia, among others. So the technology exists. We know the technology is being employed at least in part for the evaluation of vulnerability and volatility for organic and inorganic substances.โ€

A laymanโ€™s understanding of Dr. Giordanoโ€™s scientific analysis boils down to this(feel free to offer corrections/more insight): That microwaves and sound (accoustics) are the two forms of energy that scientists agree, could be harnessed, scaled and deployed to effect the kind of attacks experienced by U.S. Embassy staff in Havana, Cuba. Scientists also agree that this kind of technology(sound and microwave directed energy) is readily available in the U.S.(and its Western allies), China, and Russia, and is currently used for surveillance and other industrial applications(testing the vulnerability of organic and inorganic substances). This scientific analysis by Dr. Giordano is very important because to this day, mainstream media reports have characterized Havana Syndrome as being caused by some hostile foreign power(prime suspect Russia), using some mysterious technology that nobody in the U.S. knows about. Clearly, per Dr. Giordanoโ€™s analysis, this technology is already being used in the United States for surveillance and other industrial applications, meaning part of the inquiry into the causes of Havana Syndrome going forward, has to look inward, as opposed to only pointing the finger at Russia and China.

The webinar also featured a joint discussion by Cipher CEO Suzanne Kelly and Fox News National Security Analyst Daniel Hoffman, which focused squarely on the national security implications of Havana Syndrome, as opposed to the other panelists who delved into the clinical aspects. Even though this was an interesting discussion, it totally sidestepped the million dollar question which many attendees, including Yours Truly tuned in for, and that is, Havana Syndrome among regular civilians(not government employees).

Interestingly, the million dollar question found itโ€™s way into the webinar at the very end(after Dr. Giordanoโ€™s presentation), as the panelists were entertaining written questions from attendees. One of the questions directed at Dr. Giordano asked what regular civilians(ding ding dingโ€“magic word) who suspect they are victims of similar directed energy attacks, should do?(see video below @ 1:50) Dr. Giordanoโ€™s answer was very interesting. He said regular civilians should first consult their attending physicians with their concerns, and upon a traumatic brain injury(TBI) diagnosis, have their attending physician refer them to Walter Reed for further analysis. It has to be a physicianโ€™s referralโ€“none of that self-diagnosis stuff. A question as to whether thereโ€™s any evidence of regular civilians being victims of directed energy attacks came up at the 18:45 mark, and Dr. Giordano answered in the affirmative, saying yes, there is evidence both in Europe and domestically. WHOA!!

Hopefully Dr. Giordanoโ€™s suggestion for regular civilians suffering from directed energy attacks will encourage them to seek the much needed medical attention, and crucially, provide enough leads for scientists and government investigators, to get to the bottom of the Havana Syndrome mystery. Hopefully , it also opens up debate about the plight of regular civilians vis a vis directed energy weapons in the mainstream media, and in the halls of Congress where strangely, this remains a taboo topic, as exhibited by the tweet below.

For those of you very happy with @Emolclauseโ€™s activism donโ€™t shy away from the โ€œtip jarโ€ below on your way out. You may also Cash App

Email author at admin@grassrootsdempolitics.com

Become an Octapharma Plasma donor. Make up to $200 in one week and help save lives too! Learn More

Senator Shaheen Says Havana Syndrome Most Likely Caused By โ€œMicrowave Directed Energy Attacksโ€

$upport via Cash App

Senator Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH) appeared on MSNBCโ€™s Andrea Mitchell Reports (12/15/21), where she gave an update on the investigation into the causes/origins of Havana Syndrome. Senator Shaheen said Russia remains the chief suspect, adding that she agrees with the assessment of the National Academy of Sciences, that these are most likely โ€œmicrowave directed energy attacks.โ€

Sen Shaheen said part of the defense authorization bill currently being debated in Congress, seeks to provide a coordinator who will look into Havana Syndrome cases across all federal agencies, and keep Congress apprised on any new findings.

Sen Shaheen told host Andrea Mitchell:โ€œWhat we want is a coordinator, not just within the various agencies where theyโ€™ve had personnel attacked, but also someone who can coordinate the entire effort, and thatโ€™s part of the amendment thatโ€™s in the defense bill, as well as a regular reporting to Congress. We want to know exactly whatโ€™s going on so that we can respond. Itโ€™s very troubling that this happened years ago, five years ago, and we still donโ€™t know whoโ€™s responsible, we donโ€™t know exactly the cause of the attacks, and weโ€™re not sure whoโ€™s doing it.โ€

Neither Senator Shaheen nor MSNBCโ€™s Andrea Mitchel addressed the growing elephant-in-the-room question regarding directed energy attacks, and that is, growing complaints by regular civilians in the U.S.(not diplomats), who claim to be victims of directed energy attacks, leaving them with symptoms of Havana Syndromeโ€“complaints similar to the one below. Will the designated Havana Syndrome coordinator also hear from such regular civilians and report back to Congress? Hmm

Bottom line folks, the U.S. constitution intended for members of Congress to function as representatives of their constituents. Where, as here, we have Congress totally ignoring cries from regular civilians(their constituents) of directed energy attacks, while at the same time enacting a scheme to compensate and treat similarly afflicted government employees, one can only conclude that the era of representative government is long goneโ€“a sad state of affairs indeed. At some point, hopefully soon, Congress will have to entertain Havana Syndrome complaints from regular civilians. Then, and only then, will the public have confidence in the governmentโ€™s investigation into Havana Syndrome.

For those of you very happy with @Emolclauseโ€™s activism donโ€™t shy away from the โ€œtip jarโ€ below on your way out. You may also Cash App

Email author at admin@grassrootsdempolitics.com

Become an Octapharma Plasma donor. Make up to $200 in one week and help save lives too!ย Learn More