Are DOGE Cuts To Blame For The Tragedy In Kerr County Texas?

A bombshell report on MSNBCโ€™s All In with Chris Hayes show raises questions as to whether cuts by the Department of Government Efficiency(DOGE) cuts to the National Weather Service(NWS) may have negatively impacted storm preparation efforts in Kerr County Texas flood that has left as many asโ€ฆpeople dead

The crux of Hayesโ€™ argument is that the person whose job it was, to issue weather warnings for Kerr County had opted for the DOGE buyouts (early retirement essentially) and that a replacement was never named for him. Hayes argues that had he still been employed, there would have been better coordination of the weather warnings, mitigating the loss of lives and property.

Of course there will never be a way to verify whether this key position would have saved lives and property from the generational floods, but thereโ€™s a legitimate debate as to whether DOGE cuts to NWS generally, have negatively impacted their forecasting/warning capabilities. Is NWS for example, even ready for this hurricane season after the DOGE cuts?

These are the types of questions the public needs to start asking now, before another weather-related disaster hits.

President Trumpโ€™s 062925 Interview On Fox News

U.S. President Donald Trump sat down with Fox Newsโ€™ Maria Bartiromo on 06/29/25 for a wide ranging interview that covered the recent U.S. bombing of Iranโ€™s nuclear facilities, the Big Beautiful Bill, immigration, tariffs and many other topics.

One very interesting exchange happened when host Maria Bartiromo asked President Trump how his administration intends to tackle the massive layoffs/job losses that will assuredly happen as a result of developments in artificial intelligence. Trump responded that he will solve that by “bringing in more companies”–a strange answer that appeared to shock Maria. 

It wasn’t clear whether the president meant bringing in more AI companies to hire more people, or whether he meant bringing in other companies to offset the job losses caused by AI. What’s clear is that neither option adequately addresses the core question raised by Maria. 

I was left wondering whether Fox News, or any other media outlet for that matter, would have let former President Biden off the hook with such an inadequate answer to real and present concerns surrounding AI? My guess is they would would have found a way to tie such an inadequate response to his “mental unfitness for office.” 

Is The Media Covering Up The Damage In Israel?

Troubling reports on social media are increasingly suggesting that the public is not being told the truth about the extent of damages the state of Israel has sustained, and is sustaining, in its war with Iran. On Thursday 06/19/25, Col Wilkerson appeared on MSNBC’s All In w/Chris and all but confirmed these troubling reports. He told host Hayes that Prime Minister Netanyahu, and indeed the citizens of Israel, are stunned at how effective the Iranian missiles have been–essentially that they they underestimated their capabilities.

Long story short, it appears that initial indications suggest that Israelโ€™s PM Netanyahu may have grossly underestimated Iranian military capabilities when he he recently launched a preemptive attack.

The Trump administration has recently showed signs of an eagerness to join Israel in its bombardment of Iran. It will be interesting to see how they process these new reports that Israel is actually suffering more than PM Netanyahu is publicly admitting.

Economists Questioning Accuracy Of Trump Adminโ€™s Economic Data

A troubling report on CNNโ€™s Outfront with Erin Burnett says that economists are beginning to question whether the economic data coming out of the Trump administration is accurate/reliable.

As host Erin Burnett correctly points out, economists around the world regard the economic data coming out of the U.S., as the gold standard, in large part due to their belief that itโ€™s free from political manipulation.

If U.S. numbers canโ€™t be trusted anymore, as this report suggests, it is bound to affect the U.S. economy negatively in key sectors that rely on that โ€œgold standardโ€ perception. I think we can all agree that regardless of what political party is in power in the United States, economic data must remain independent.

Big Beautiful Billโ€™s Trickle Down Theory Questioned

$upport viaย Cash App๐Ÿ‘‡

Republicans have for decades advanced this theory that if you give tax cuts to the wealthy (business owners), the wealth they โ€œcreateโ€ would eventually trickles down to the middle and lower classโ€”the so-called โ€œtrickle-downโ€ economic theory.

History however has proven time and time again that the trickle down economic theory never works as promised, and instead, only widens the gap between the rich and the poor. This topic came up in an interesting segment of MSNBCโ€™s Morning Joe show (06/03/25), and as you can tell from the heavy reaction, Americans appear to have caught up to the trickle down lie, as Republicans yet again push the Big Beautiful Bill.

Hell, even Grok sided with opponents of the trickle down theory

It will be interesting to see how Republicans progress with the Big Beautiful Bill, now that the trickle down lie has been exposed.

For those of you very happy withย @Emolclauseโ€™s activism donโ€™t shy away from the CashApp โ€œtip jarโ€ below on your way out.

Email author at admin@grassrootsdempoliticst.com

House Speaker Grilled Over โ€œBig Beautiful Billโ€

$upport via Cash App๐Ÿ‘‡

House Speaker Mike Johnson appeared on CBSโ€™ Face The Nation (05/25/25) to discuss among other things, the recent House passage of the Trump administrationโ€™s budget billโ€”dubbed โ€œBig Beautiful Billโ€. The Billโ€™s fate now lies with the Republican majority in the U.S. Senate.

Among the issues raising concerns with the budget bill, is that it is projected to increase the national debt significantly, something Republican lawmakers lamented throughout the Biden administration. The bill also makes significant cuts to Medicaid and food stamps(SNAP), programs crucial for working families generally, and specifically, the working poor.

Speaker Mike Johnsonโ€™s Louisiana is one of the poorest states in the nation, so cuts to Medicaid and food stamps are bound to have relatively more disastrous effects on families there. Asked by host Margaret Brennan how he can justify pushing such cuts knowing full well that his state is one of the poorest in the nation, Speaker Johnson responded that all the bill cuts is waste, fraud and abuse.

It will be interesting to see how Speaker Johnson and other House Republicans use this excuse once their poor constituents start complaining about the cuts. Even more interesting, will be the way Republicans defend this tricky position as we approach the 2026 midterm elections. 

For those of you very happy with @Emolclauseโ€™s activism donโ€™t shy away from the CashApp โ€œtip jarโ€ below on your way out.

Email author at admin@grassrootsdempoliticst.com

Is Corruption The Dem Ticket To Victory In 2026?

$upport via Cash App๐Ÿ‘‡

Ever since President Trump beat his Democratic challenger Kamala Harris in the 2024 U.S. presidential election, Democrats have been in disarray, struggling to find a compelling narrative with which to challenge the new Trump administration.

Corruption is slowly becoming the galvanizing issue that is uniting Democrats in their opposition to the Trump administration. My posts on X(formerly Twitter) referencing these corruption stories generate a lot of engagement(retweets, likes, comments) which supports my assertion that corruption is clearly a hot topic for Democrats as we approach the 2026 midterms. Below are examples of such posts.

Will Democrats capitalize on this corruption issue to victory in the 2026 midterms? Only time will tell.

For those of you very happy with @Emolclauseโ€™s activism donโ€™t shy away from the CashApp โ€œtip jarโ€ below on your way out.

Email author at admin@grassrootsdempolitics.com

DOGE Accused Of Amassing Massive Data For Political Dosiers

Bombshell report on the 04/30/25 edition of the Rachel Maddow Show (citing the NY times) says that the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) is amassing massive amounts of people’s private data from various government agencies in an effort to create a central database that could potentially be used/abused to create “dossiers” of political opponents of President Trump.

Yours Truly captured part of Maddow’s commentary in the tweet below (X below if you like๐Ÿ™„๐Ÿ˜‚).

NY Times’ Julia Angwin told host Maddow that this [dossier politics] is very common in authoritarian countries, especially China. She specifically said: “China is sort of the example that does this. They have these master files that they have on every citizen, everything that they’ve ever done, it’s called social credit score, and they use it to punish dissent.”

Importantly, and quite scaringly, Angwin says compared to other Western nations, America’s privacy laws are the worst equipped to dealing with the dangers of such a centralized database. She adds that our system was designed based on this notion that government officials will always be acting in good faith, and thus tread carefully re the private data of citizens.

If this reporting holds up, it looks like America is gearing up for the biggest civil liberties fight of her 400 year existence. I hate to be a Debbie Downer here, but given since the passage of the Patriot Act right after 09/11, we’ve witnessed increasing encroachments to our civil liberties, and privacy in particular. 

I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again, advances in technology have for all intents and purposes, rendered the 4thamendment moot. Consequently, there’s no privacy to defend. Congress has had numerous opportunities to deal with the problem, but abdicated at every turn. Too late to solve the problem now.๐Ÿคท. 

I’ve been quite consistent about this issue. This was me ranting and raving about very issue way back in 2019๐Ÿ˜ณ๐Ÿ‘‡When some big time MSMer starts bandwagoning over the issue, make sure to remind them that Yours Truly was already crying about this in 2019โ€ฆwhen MSM thought it was just another โ€œconspiracy theoryโ€.๐Ÿ™„

Maddow Fact Checks Trumpโ€™s SOTU Address

Support via Cash app๐Ÿ‘‡

On 03/04/25, President Donald Trump delivered the customary State of The Union address before a joint session of Congress. Per MSNBCโ€™s Rachel Maddow, this was the longest State of The Union speech ever delivered by a U.S. president.

Moments after President Trumpโ€™s address, Maddow delivered a blistering fact check to Trumpโ€™s address

Among the issues that Maddow fact checked President Trump on, was his assertion that he had spoken with the heads of U.S. auto manufacturers, and that they were happy with his proposed tariffs on the auto industry.

Maddow specifically said, “For the record, U.S. auto company CEOs are NOT psyched, and delighted, and sooo excited about Trump’s economic policies, including his tariffs.”

Less than 24 hours after Maddowโ€™s fact check, news broke that the Trump administration was pausing itโ€™s proposed tariffs on automakersโ€”a tacit admission that the said CEOs had never expressed optimism about the proposed auto tariffs, as the president had indicated on his State of The Union address.

For those of you very happy with @Emolclauseโ€™s activism donโ€™t shy away from the CashApp โ€œtip jarโ€ below on your way out.

Email author at admin@grassrootsdempolitics.com

Maddow Draws Striking Parallel Between Hitler & Putin Assaults And The U.S. Reaction To Them

Support via CashApp

In the 03/03/25 edition of MSNBC’ s Rachel Maddow Show, host Maddow pointed out the striking resemblance between how the U.S. dealt with Hitler’s assault on Europe, and the way the Trump administration is dealing with Putin’s current assault on Ukraine in particular, and Europe generally.

Maddow pointed out that by July 1940, Great Britain was the only European country left standing after Hitler’s forces had practically run over every other European country.

Then U.S. President Roosevelt was doing everything in his power to assist the Brits against Hitler’s forces. But interestingly, there was no consensus in the U.S. that the we should be assisting the Brits, which is quite similar to what we hear today from some leading Republican voices re Ukraine.

One of the leading Republican voices against Roosevelt assisting the Brits, was a U.S. Senator from Minnesota, one Ernest Lundeen.

Senator Lundeen apparently argued that Britain did not deserve America’s aid because it was not “grateful enough” for America’s past assistance(World War I, etc). He also argued, much like Republicans are arguing today, that Britain and other European allies needed to dig into their own mineral resources and pay America for its assistance–again, the same argument we are hearing today from leading Republicans.

It later came out, however, that during the entire time Senator Lundeen had been making these otherwise reasonable arguments against aid to Britain (on fiscal grounds), he was actually being paid by Hitler’s Germany to make their case from his lofty perch as a U.S. Senator.

The $1 million question now is, who is Putin paying to make his case in the U.S. Congress or even from a loftier perch, which I’ll leave to your imagination? Only time will tell.

For those of you very happy with @Emolclauseโ€™s activism donโ€™t shy away from the CashApp โ€œtip jarโ€ below on your way out.

Email author at admin@grassrootsdempolitics.com